The concept of time in narratology has been extensively examined, particularly through Gérard Genette’s theoretical contributions, which offer a comprehensive framework. In Turkish narratology literature, several analyses have utilized Genette’s model. However, with the rise of post-classical narratology, certain limitations and gaps in Genette’s approach have been highlighted, leading to new developments. In this context, Mieke Bal’s work, focusing on the reception and aesthetic dimensions of narrative, stands out. This article applies the time theories of Genette and Bal to Tarık Buğra’s short story “Havuçlu Pilav Meselesi” (The Carrot Pilaf Affair), aiming to analyze the author’s use of time and its impact on the narrative’s meaning. By examining temporal shifts and anachronies, the study explores how time contributes to the narrative’s dramatic structure, showcasing a post-classical narratological reading. Combining Genette’s systematic categories with Bal’s flexible methods, the study investigates the effects of narrative time on the reader’s experience.

Narratology, temporal analysis, Mieke Bal, Tarık Buğra, Havuçlu Pilav Meselesi.